American Indian Genocide Essay

When you judge about inherent the Statesns you think peaceful village mountain moreover that is far from what really happened. What happened in the final solution was genocide but would you consider what happened to the Native Americans was genocide? on that point ar rafts of discernments and feelings about what happened like the civilise of Tears in the Indian Removal Acts and the concentration camps where they were all moved from their land so the whites could build and the Indians would die of exposure. I dont think it was a full genocide but most of the characteristics fit, so I would tail it an Internecine and an Indirect-Genocide. If you think what happened to the Native Americans was non genocide, what would you label it? First eat up Genocide it is the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.There are warning signs and events that occur in genocide and they are normally has a king or a powerful leader, and in th e Native Americans story France and Britain had lots of power during the wars. Forcing kids and people to transfer to their beliefs or religion, and Indian kids were forced to go the camps to be taught the white mans ways. Also the person or people will deliberate two mentally and physically pull down or attack a race. Indians were called paradoxical because of contrary ways to manner and were killed because they were interrupted as savage.Then the is the pronounce Internecine which is a conflict or struggle of both sides that usually results in savage behavior and slaughter of both groups that also fits into Americas History. The Native Americans fought back in the French and Indian warfare that happened from 1756 1763 so that event in the Native American history was to a greater extent of an Internecine consequently Genocide. The Europeans stereotyped the Indians The only good Indian is a dead Indian, Philip Sheridan 1869, because of their beliefs.The History of the Native Americans was made up of lots of wars and battles that can go under different labels. I would consider what happened on the Trail Of Tears from 1830 1837 was not a full genocide but I would label it an Indirect Genocide. Genocide contains deliberate mental and physically kill or attack a race, but in the Trail of Tears the Indians were not directly killed but the purlieu and lack of supplies killed them. The US government knew that the conditions were poor and that many would die but they did not fear as tenacious as they were off the land so they could expand. It was verifying murder because they sent them on a Trail of Death and did not kill them strait out like in the Holocaust where Hitler would kill Jews because they were Jewish.I would label that it was an Indirect-Genocide even though the Indians fought back they were out gunned and evenly forced to leave. I the beginning when pilgrims from Europe first tried to ensconce on North America they were killed by the environ ment when the Indians watched. The Native Americans could acquit wiped them out but they knew that where they can from had strong military and maybe would fling people to kill them for the death of the travelers and that reason it why lots of people say it was not genocide. I find it quite ironic that in the start the Europeans were weak and dyeing from poor conditions then the Indians helped them gain power, then the Trail of Tears the Europeans sent the Indians on a walk where they died from conditions and environment but they had no one(a) help them like the Native Americans had in there time of need.Some people did not even fare all the terrible things that built North America so we would fork up to label it with the same event as something bad like the Holocaust to try to show the level of the event. There are lots course to categorize what happened in the Native Americans throughout history, but as long as you can back it up it is an appropriate label. The history of the Native Americans is like a puzzle made up of many different pieces because it was not all one event or one war. My opinion I that it was not full Genocide but Indirect-Genocide and Internecine and I showed my facts and reasoning and you can agree and disagree. History cannot be labeled one thing, the only thing history has in common is it made life the way it is today.